Saliency vs Attention: Eye-Tracking Says Saliency Wins

NLP
NLU
neuroscience
paper
links
Hollenstein and Beinborn find human eye-tracking fixation duration correlates with BERT saliency, not attention — suggesting current self-attention may not be optimal.
Author

synesis

Published

January 22, 2022

Saliency vs attention from eye-tracking. Image: LinkedIn.

Interesting paper showing fixation duration obtained from eye tracking (Fig. 1) correlates better to salience-based rather than attention-based importance obtained from BERT (Table 1). This result gives cognitive-based support for the other works with similar conclusion from purely computational side.

Nora Hollenstein and Lisa Beinborn, 2021. “Relative Importance in Sentence Processing.” ArXiv [Cs.CL]. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.03471.

Abstract: Determining the relative importance of the elements in a sentence is a key factor for effortless natural language understanding. For human language processing, we can approximate patterns of relative importance by measuring reading fixations using eye-tracking technology. In neural language models, gradient-based saliency methods indicate the relative importance of a token for the target objective. In this work, we compare patterns of relative importance in English language processing by humans and models and analyze the underlying linguistic patterns. We find that human processing patterns in English correlate strongly with saliency-based importance in language models and not with attention-based importance. Our results indicate that saliency could be a cognitively more plausible metric for interpreting neural language models. The code is available on GitHub: this https URL

Originally posted on LinkedIn.